Which statement correctly matches a camera type with its primary strength?

• A. Fixed-position camera — pan-tilt-zoom for broad coverage.
• B. PTZ camera — steady feed for simple monitoring.
• C. Fixed-position camera — steady feed for simple monitoring.
• D. PTZ camera — constant recording without movement.

Answer: (C)

The key idea here is stability of the captured image. A fixed-position camera stays put, so the view remains constant and the feed is steady, which is ideal for simple monitoring where you just need to watch a single area without following movement. That makes the statement about a fixed-position camera delivering a steady feed for simple monitoring the best match.

A PTZ camera, by contrast, is designed to move—it can pan, tilt, and zoom to cover larger areas or track activity. That movement introduces changes in framing and can affect steadiness, so its main strength isn’t a perfectly steady feed for simple monitoring.

The other options misstate either the capabilities of a fixed-position camera (which cannot pan-tilt-zoom) or the typical strength of a PTZ camera (which is flexibility and coverage through movement, not an inherently steady feed), or imply a primary attribute (constant recording without movement) that isn’t what PTZ cameras are known for.